ron.even.tlv at gmail.com
Mon Mar 9 09:25:53 CET 2009
I am not sure I fully understand your question. Are you asking if the media
type registration need to be in the same document as the payload
Look in RFC 4855 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4855) for published
specification, there it says that registration and the payload specification
can be different documents.
I am not sure that I know of such cases. In some cases there are RFC that
update the registration for example by adding parameters.
From: ietf-types-bounces at alvestrand.no
[mailto:ietf-types-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Santoni Adriano
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 9:05 AM
To: ietf-types at alvestrand.no
Subject: general question
I have the following doubt, and would like someone to enlighten me.
Is it mandatory that a media type registration be included in the RFC that
defines such media type?
It seems to me, if I am not mistaken, that there are several media types
defined in RFCs which does not contain an explicit media type registration..
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ietf-types