Reminder: Ulster Scots
doug at ewellic.org
Wed Mar 31 20:14:16 CEST 2010
> Hands up, everyone, ulster or 2006ulst and why.
I vote for 'ulster'. It is functionally equivalent to '2006ulst' and
much, much less cryptic. We can always register 'ulster15' if an
incompatibly different standard does emerge five years from now.
We also need to decide whether the intended scope is
dialect-plus-orthography or just orthography.
Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org
RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ http://is.gd/2kf0s
More information about the Ietf-languages