Last call for ISO 15924-based updates
doug at ewellic.org
Wed Mar 18 04:40:37 CET 2009
Michael Everson <everson at evertype dot com> was quoted by CE:
>> I disagree. The statement of what Zinh is in the registry for is
>> already in Doug's draft. There is no reason to add an imperative
>> statement telling users of the registry Not To Use It.
> I did not find it only Michael's citation of it . . . (I went through
> the draft online
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10 )
Such a statement would belong in draft-4646bis, preferably Section 4.1,
not in draft-4645bis. Draft-4646bis-21 was submitted to the co-chairs
for IETF Last Call before this controversy erupted about the use (or
anticipated misuse) of 'Zinh'.
I would hope that some kind of statement, akin to the bullet points in
item 5 of Section 4.1, could be added to draft-4646bis before approval
and publication, but there is no guarantee that this will happen.
Doug Ewell * Thornton, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14
More information about the Ietf-languages