petercon at microsoft.com
Mon Mar 27 20:50:48 CEST 2006
Oh, well. We can deprecate those two after 3066ter is done.
From: Addison Phillips [mailto:addison at yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 10:46 AM
To: Peter Constable; ietf-languages at iana.org; ltru at ietf.org
Subject: RE: zh-min-nan, zh-xiang
I never saw registration requests to that effect, so I would guess the answer is "no".
Internationalization Architect - Yahoo! Inc.
Internationalization is an architecture.
It is not a feature.
From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Peter Constable
Sent: 2006?3?27? 10:40
To: ietf-languages at iana.org; ltru at ietf.org
Subject: zh-min-nan, zh-xiang
Before 3066bis was completed, we added some entries in the 3066 tag registry to bring consistency with our plan for extlang and 639-3. Specifically, we added zh-cmn to supersede zh-guoyu.
I thought that we had done something similar to deal with zh-min-nan and zh-xiang:
zh-min-nan superseded by zh-nan
zh-xiang superseded by zh-hsn
(Note: in 639-2/639-3, min is the ID for a Philippine language completely unrelated to Chinese.)
I don't see this reflected in the sub-tag registry, however. Did we not make those changes in the 3066 registry?
GIFT | GPTS | MICROSOFT
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ietf-languages